Glam Prestige Journal

Bright entertainment trends with youth appeal.

$\begingroup$

Let $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ be a random sample of size $n$ from a population with density

$f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{lr} e^{\theta-x} & , x \geq\theta\\ 0 & , \text{otherwise} \end{array} \right.$

Find the maximum likelihood estimator for $\theta$.

Here is my attempt:

$\begin{align*} L(\theta)&=\prod_{k=1}^{n}e^{\theta-x_k}\\ &=\prod_{k=1}^{n}e^\theta e^{-x_k}\\ &=e^{n\theta}\prod_{k=1}^{n}e^{-x_k}\\ &=e^{n\theta} e^{-\sum_{k=1}^{n}} \end{align*}$

Then $\ln L(\theta)=n\theta-\sum_{k=1}^{n}x_k$

Take the derivative with respect to $\theta$ to get

$n$

But there is no $\theta$ in this expression, and so how can I find the MLE of $\theta$?

$\endgroup$ 7

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

Your expression for likelihood is not completely correct. It should be

$$L(\theta) = \exp(n\theta) \exp(-\sum_1^n x_k) 1_{\theta \leq X_{(1)}}$$ where $X_{(1)}$ is the smallest of all $X_i$'s. We need the extra term because the likelihood will be zero if any $X_i$ is smaller than $\theta$. Now, we know that exponential is increasing function and we want $\theta \leq X_{(1)} $ for $L$ to be nonzero. Hence, the maximum should occur at $\hat{\theta} = X_{(1)}$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy