Glam Prestige Journal

Bright entertainment trends with youth appeal.

$\begingroup$

I'm trying to prove the following theorem, and I'm not sure my proof holds.

Theorem. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space, $p\in X$, and $r >0$. Then $$E = \left\{x\in X\ |\ d(x,p)\leq r\right\}$$ is a closed subset of $X$.

Proof. $E$ is closed if and only if it contains all of its limit points. Let $\{x_n\} \subset E$ such that $x_n \to x$. We claim that $x \in E$. Since $x_n$ converges, for all $\epsilon > 0$, there exists an $N$, such that for all $n \geq N$, $d(x,x_n) < \epsilon.$

By the triangle inequality $d(p,x) \leq d(p, x_n) + d(x_n, x)$ and so $d(p,x) < r + \epsilon$ for all $\epsilon > 0$. So, at the least $d(p,x) \leq r$, and $x$ is contained in E. The proof is complete.

Is my bolded step logically wrong? Thanks!

$\endgroup$ 2

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

[Disclaimer: This might be a little bit too nitpicky on my part.]

First $E$ is not a unit closed ball, it's an $r$-closed-ball if you like.

More important than that, your bolded step does not really add anything to the previous sentence, viz., we have $\forall a,b\in\mathbb{R}$:

$$a\leq b \iff \forall \varepsilon>0: a<b+\varepsilon.$$

$\endgroup$ 2

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy